I’ve been doing a lot of thinking about the awards program, and having some really good conversations with several of you about it. Paul and Santi have been especially insightful, thank you.
I’ve been trying to shape the program in POTA’s image to make it easier for people who are doing POTA now to slide into our program. What I’ve realized is that this isn’t the POTA awards program, it’s the PN&R awards program, and it isn’t necessary to carry over the pieces of POTA that I don’t believe align with the core value of POTA News & Reviews: That radio is an excuse to get into and experience some amazing open spaces.
That’s what the reviews on PN&R are all about, exploring the world around us in the context of ham radio.
That’s what the POTAmap is all about, helping people find new places to explore.
That’s what this forum is all about, a place where we can share all the cool places we’re going and the gear we’re using to do it.
Given all of that, I think that the goal of the PN&R awards program is this:
The POTA News & Reviews Awards program is established to encourage hams to explore the outdoors while communicating with other hams worldwide.
Or something like that.
What does this mean practically? It means that there will be no operating category for any activator award that provides for sitting in a vehicle, or using the vehicle for power or support. We’re leaning hard into the SOTA rules here. An open question: Should there be a power limit? I’m thinking 100W max.
Another outcome of the shift is that there won’t be classes of awards that reward sheer volume like the Kilo awards.
There are other programs for those who like to sit in parking lots.
This is POTA for operators who like to be in the outdoors.